Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-11.txt> (Data Fields for In-situ OAM) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 03:32:00PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Let me comment on this. I've been one of the three TLS registry experts for a couple of years. TL;DR I think the draft is not in conflict with how things are done.
> 
> 
> On 12/2/20, 5:37 AM, "tom petch" <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>     This I-D seems at odds with RFC8126 over the use of Expert Review in s.8.7
> 
>     ' The responsible AD will appoinht ...'
>     RFC8126 seems clear that the IESG appoints and may do so in advance and 
>     having more than one is recommended
> 
> Well, the AD is part of the IESG. From what I have seen, registry experts are always appointed by the AD's, as they are expected to be the subject matter experts.

A single AD is tasked with finding volunteers to be expert(s), but the IESG
as a whole approves them.

-Ben

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux