> On Nov 10, 2020, at 05:21, tom petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am confused about the treatment here of DTLS. > > The Abstract seems clear about the proposed action for TLS but then the second paragraph has > " This document also deprecates Datagram TLS (DTLS) version 1.0 (RFC6347)" > > Mmmm, really? Sorry for any confusion introduced as a result of this typo. DTLS 1.0 is RFC4347 not RFC 6347; RFC 6347 is DTLS 1.2. OLD: This document also deprecates Datagram TLS (DTLS) version 1.0 (RFC6347) NEW: This document also deprecates Datagram TLS (DTLS) version 1.0 (RFC4347) spt -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
