xml2rfc v3 vs v2, was: Survey design and interpretation (was: Re: Final reminder: Please fill out our survey on IETF authoring tools)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John,

replying to one bit of special interest to me:

Am 04.11.2020 um 16:48 schrieb John C Klensin:
(4.c) Then there are questions about how satisfied I am with
xml2rfc as an authoring tool, with a scale from "very satisfied"
to "very dissatisfied".  Reasonable question except that there
are some of us who are "very" (or closer than "nearly")
satisfied with v2 (perhaps for substantive reasons and perhaps
because we are just used to it) and very dissatisfied with v3.
> ...

I would really like to understand what would make you be unhappy with v3
as opposed to v2. Could you please elaborate a bit (either here, or on a
more xml2rfc-specific list)?

Best regards, Julian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux