Re: [Last-Call] [babel] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



SGTM2

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:10 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke=40toke.dk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@xxxxxxx> writes:

>>   “A node MUST NOT send more that one Source Prefix sub-TLV in a TLV,
>>    and a node receiving more than one Source Prefix sub-TLV in a single
>>    TLV SHOULD ignore this TLV.  It MAY ignore the whole packet.”
>
>> 2. This paragraph implies that a node might accept the TLV with more than one
>> Source Prefix sub-TLV, but it does not state when a node can do that. You might
>> want to elaborate on the conditions that a node is allowed to do that.
>
> Right.  I've made this a MUST, which reflects implementation practice.
> Group, please feel free to object if you think this is the wrong
> choice.

SGTM.

-Toke

--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux