Re: Call for Community Feedback: Guidance on Reporting Protocol Vulnerabilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/28/20 8:37 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
     >> I worry about something like "protocol-vulnerabilities@xxxxxxxx" becoming swamped with implementation issues, but I would support this if we agreed it was a two-year experiment or something.

    Too much success ? We are not paying money, so why the fear ? Any similar
     problems in other places ?

Overloading the people who will be filtering the emails.



Isn't overloading filtering of implementation questions signal in and of itself? if a particular protocol is generating lots of implementation questions, that's could be telling you it is underspecified. but ietf is not the first place i'd think to come to with implementation issues. stackoverflow, etc is where i'd head first.

Mike




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux