Eliot, those are some awesome edits.
Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Second, it helps to simplify by having a routing function. Researchers
> and most others don't want to play Inside Baseball with us. Since you
> are already advertising “protocol-vulnerability@xxxxxxxx
> <mailto:protocol-vulnerability@xxxxxxxx>” why not just let that be the
> lead point of contact, and say something like this:
What is going to behind this address?
It says a non-public archive.
So it needs to be something people can send to without subscription.
It needs to go into a ticket system that can acknowledge the submission. (RT,
whatever). We'll probably have to have someone delete the spam.
It might be worth having a return reachability check on the email to help
reduce the spam load.
It would be nice if it could show up in author's DT account to respond, on
record.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
