Hello, Sheng, Thanks so much for your comments! In-line.... On 19/10/20 23:58, Sheng Jiang via Datatracker wrote: [...]
Overall Summary: This draft is a document that intents to be an Informational RFC. This document gives some recommendation to improve the reaction and performance of Customer Edge Routers in the IPv6 renumbering events. It updates RFC7084. Overall this is a well written document. There is a small Nit: in the information reference, [I-D.gont-6man-slaac-renum] has been listed twice.
Note: [I-D.gont-6man-slaac-renum] is referenced to Ack the folks that reviewed that document, on which the present one is based.
However, I have a more fundamental question. It may be easily addressed by AD saying it was not an issue: as an informational document, it should only give information or recommendation to the readers or implementors. However, this document has a lot of "MUST", which is too strong and I think it should only appear in Standard Stack or BCP documents. If so, this document may need revise, even rework in the WG.
Please see Section 2. Those terms are *not* being employed as in RFC2119, and are employed in the same was as in RFC7084, which this document means to update.
Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
