Hi Russ,
Thank you for your comment! I believe the intention was to delete the following 2 paragraphs and that is what I put in the version that I am working on (already in github). I expect to publish the new draft version here shortly.
Thanks,
Ivaylo
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:03 PM Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I read the document, and it is ready, except for the note to the RFC Editor. It is clear where to start deleting, bit it is not obvious where to stop.
Russ
> On Sep 17, 2020, at 2:44 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption
> WG (cose) to consider the following document: - 'CBOR Object Signing and
> Encryption (COSE): Header parameters for
> carrying and referencing X.509 certificates'
> <draft-ietf-cose-x509-07.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-10-01. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> The CBOR Signing And Encrypted Message (COSE) structure uses
> references to keys in general. For some algorithms, additional
> properties are defined which carry parts of keys as needed. The COSE
> Key structure is used for transporting keys outside of COSE messages.
> This document extends the way that keys can be identified and
> transported by providing attributes that refer to or contain X.509
> certificates.
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-x509/
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
