The IETF IPR working group needs to be reopened. The reasons are that copyright and co-copyright standings for parties who have patent protected ip included into network protocols needs to be addressed.
As evidence of this co-copyright holders have monetization demand rights for any and all uses of their ip in co-copyright controlled publications.
Any IETF standard containing a patents methods becomes co-copyright controlled upon ietf publication.
This is further complicated by the COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU, and it's SCHREMS2 (#311/18) ruling, and the expansion of the areas called OVER THE TOP (OTT) of the internet regulated through the EU EECC legislation.
As such the general standards for IETF copyright controlled publications need a new publication boilerplate taking co-copyright into account and amending a existing copyrights that fail to address this based on a vote by the technology based engineering terms who mistakenly declared the previous IETF COPYRIGHT limited and free of co-copyright standings and the rights accorded to co-copyright holders. Finally, IETF standards (including rfc and internet draft publications) must also declare themselves bound by any key legislation where those are used or published in any form for review.
Best to you all.
//Ts Glassey
