Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> having to assume EST. Therefore the above BRSKI diff (and BRSKI-AE) propose
> to introduce a /.well-known/brski registry.
I believe that I ran the text by Mark, who I believe is the /.well-known
expert reviewer. I believe that he said that it looked good, but it would be
great if Mark could confirm that I got it right.
>> Dear ANIMA WG
>>
>> This email starts a 2 week call for consensus to modify draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra
>> such that new well-known URIs introduced by BRSKI will use a /.well-known/brski
>> prefix instead of the pre-existing /.well-known/est prefix.
>>
>> The proposed change can be seen at the following rfcdiff URL:
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-43&url2=draft-richardson-anima-brski-renamed-00
>>
>> This consensus call will end on September 14, 23:59 UTC
>> This consensus call is ONLY for said change and not for any other aspects of BRSKI.
Existing implementers have agreed to the change.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
