Meral, thanks for the review. The document does say in the first sentence of the Introduction that the preview is for the end user. I agree that it would be useful to emphasize that, though, and I think the right place to do it is by adding to the first paragraph of Section 3.2 something like the following: “The preview string is meant to help the end-user, and is not intended to be interpreted in any way by the client software.”
Barry
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 4:52 PM Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2020-09-15
IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have
some comments.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments: In Section 4.2, it would have been good to give some
example and advice on when the client uses the preview to take some action. Is
this to be avoided? (Was not very clear to me).
Best Regards,
Meral Shirazipour
www.ericsson.com
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
