Re: [Last-Call] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 07:33:09AM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:

[...]
 
> > I would probably simply remove text that talks about the general use
> > of timers. It is not needed to understand the problem, I think it
> > actually confuses the problem. For me, the prefix is soft-state that a
> > box learned (like it learns a lot of other soft-state) and so you
> > either go for 'reasonably short' lifetimes or you design mechanisms to
> > detect and handle stale information gracefully.
> 
> Fair enough. So, removing beginning of the section up to, and including the
> sentence that says "For obvious reasons, the whole ...", then?

Yes.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux