Re: Terminology discussion threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13 Aug 2020, at 13:15, Toerless Eckert wrote:

If the topic is meant to be disucssed an a gendispatch interrim, would it not too be appropriate to ask for the discussion to go to gendispatch mailing list until that
group has decided on a better place ?

Speaking as one of the two gendispatch chairs: I supported the idea of bringing this topic to a gendispatch interim because I think in a (virtual) f2f we can probably sort out a way for this discussion to be had in a reasonable forum, bring that solution back to the gendispatch list, and then have gendispatch recommend to the Gen AD what to do with this work. (Which is not to say that we will definitely recommend that the work continue; we have a number of possible outcomes. But I think we can successfully have that conversation.)

However, I did not, as one of the gendispatch chairs, sign up to moderate the entire discussion of IETF guidance or policy around oppressive or exclusionary language in documents. I agree with the IETF Chair that the discussion on the IETF list was at least unproductively spinning its wheels and probably causing harm in and of itself, and that a pause in the conversation on the IETF list was justified. I also understand that having a gendispatch interim and the subsequent discussion on the gendispatch list in order to dispatch the topic to some other forum (or to reject the work item) is likely to involve some amount of discussion on the merits of the topic, and I'm prepared to moderate that level of discussion. But I'm not inclined to be given the task to actually bring this discussion to conclusion. It's out of charter for gendispatch, I don't think it will be productive on the gendispatch list, and it's more than a bit beyond what I'm willing to take on right now.

I am sorry that gendispatch was unable to have dispatched this before the discussion on the IETF list got this far. But we are where we are. I'm committed to getting an interim or two scheduled for "a few days plus 2 weeks" from now, and to push the list to make a recommendation to the AD exceedingly quickly after that. That's all I can do.

pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux