RE: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

[Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

>> Simply re-posting and re-asking a question isn’t going to change the answer.

 

I keep asking from time to time as long as I still see the problem goes bigger and affects all, aiming to find some help after these talks.

 

From: Joseph Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 9:36 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; int-area <int-area@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

 

 

On Aug 11, 2020, at 9:27 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

It’s really weird to hear the silence for my e-mails at the IETf main list,...

 

You were told in 2017 that this was not appropriate for this list and to take this topic to INTAREA.

 

You did and it was discussed and rejected for further discussion here:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/cYhjioyneuGF-Y0LEHUiO_p91jo/

 

If you want further consideration:

            a) *significantly* update your proposal, addressing the feedback you received 3 years ago

            b) post a request to evaluate that new proposal to INTAREA

 

Simply re-posting and re-asking a question isn’t going to change the answer.

 

PS - the link below is to -06; the most recent (and still expired) is -11.

 

Joe

 

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Khaled Omar
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 3:48 AM
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

 

...

 

Here is the linky to the IPv10 I-D:

 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06

 

THANK YOU,

 

Khaled Omar