Lars, > On Jul 24, 2020, at 5:32 AM, Lars Eggert <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been reading this thread, and don't understand how this IESG statement is controversial. > > Many of us learned in recent years that some terminology and language that's been used in the past alienates or is otherwise objectionable to a part of our community. Alternative terms readily exist, sometimes even offering a more precise meaning. How is it not the right thing to simply start using these alternative terms when we can? > > Sure, an occasional change in terminology is only a small step. But it's still moving us in the right direction, and costs us practically nothing. > Well said. We can’t fix the world, but we can fix the part we have control over. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
