Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-22

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2020 3:26 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ops-dir@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: last-call@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-
> channel.all@xxxxxxxx; mmusic@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-
> channel-22
> 
> Hi Al,
> 
> Thank You for the review! Please see inline.
> 
> >Reviewer: Al Morton
> >Review result: Has Nits
> >
> >OPS-DIR review of MSRP over Data Channels
> >draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-21
<snip>
> Nits:
> 
> >2.  Conventions
> >   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALLNOT",
> s/"SHALLNOT"/"SHALL NOT"/
> 
> This has been fixed in version -22. Maybe you were looking at version -21?
[acm] 
Yes, when I asked for the html-ized tools version, -21 is the version that appeared,
and I recorded this in the beginning of the review.  I don't control the subject line or
header generated by the review tool.

Al

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> 
> 
> [0]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dmmusic-2Dmsrp-2Dusage-2Ddata-
> 2Dchannel_shepherdwriteup_&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=STZGgunKZhhZfnd2hdhbpcWd2FNcD
> 4TUCdc_bHAWew4&s=T_B-y_qO8-clmNexDOEiLgty5u4rN-1MJYOyXEjMdeI&e=
> 
> 

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux