Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Larry Masinter <LMM@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:52:31 +0200
Cc: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <00a601d65cc7$64f8c2c0$2eea4840$@acm.org>
References: <00a601d65cc7$64f8c2c0$2eea4840$@acm.org>

Huh? URIs are not just for browsers.

Sent from mobile, sorry for terse

On 18. Jul 2020, at 07:51, Larry Masinter <LMM@xxxxxxx> wrote:

- Must have proof-of-concept implementation, two or more browsers commit to implement

References:
- RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
  - From: Larry Masinter

Prev by Date: Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-06
Next by Date: RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
Previous by thread: RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
Next by thread: RE: Appeal from Tim McSweeney regarding draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux