Agreeing with what Iljitsch said, with the addition that the "deadline" was imposed to get people to submit proposals so the working group had something to discuss, not to exclude proposals that show up two weeks later. The chairs made explicit requests on the mailing list to ANYONE to submit an SCTP multihoming draft, so SCTP won't be excluded. Spencer From: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@xxxxxxxxx> > > > I must admit that I haven't following the multi6 too closely yet, but I > > plan to catch up and follow. But from what I have seen, it seems that > > SCTP > > is ignored on the sidelines. > > Actually the chairs went out of their way to get an SCTP multihoming > draft in before the deadline. The deadline for submitting drafts that > would be considered has recently passed, so now is a good time to read > the drafts and join the architectural analysis that should be starting > shortly.