Behaviour on IETF lists (Re: The IETF Mission)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dean,

the subject of the IETF mission is not particularly relevant to bashing NANOG policies, or personal attacks on persons for their activities within NANOG.
Nor are personal attacks appropriate on the IETF list.
If you want to quarrel about NANOG topics, at least change the subject.
Or better yet, take it to NANOG.


--On 30. januar 2004 11:46 -0500 Dean Anderson <dean@xxxxxxx> wrote:

So Nanog is quite a bit different from the IETF, and, in my opinion,
should not be associated with or compared to the IETF.  Actually being
right on concrete issues is something that carries no weight with Nanog,
but it does carry weight with the IETF.



Attachment: pgp00418.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]