Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-08 Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review Date: 2020-06-29 IETF LC End Date: 2020-07-06 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: A couple of minor issues and a couple of *extremely* nitty nits, but overall looks ready to go. Major issues: None. Minor issues: It is not clear to me why this is being sent for Informational instead of Proposed Standard. The shepherd's writeup does not justify it, and in fact the writeup refers to the document as a "specification", which is exactly what it appears to be. It defines the use of SFLs, describes how they are processed by the endpoints, describes how they are aggregated, etc. While the document may not be standalone, I don't see how it's really an Informational document. I suggest restarting the Last Call for Proposed, and if for some reason it needs to be Informational, it can always be downgraded after Last Call. The Security Considerations section says, "The issue noted in Section 6 is a security consideration." I'm not sure I understand why that is. Nits/editorial comments: Section 1: "(see Section 3)" seems unnecessary. Section 3: I thought the "Consider..." construction made those paragraphs unnecessarily wordy and a bit harder to follow. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
