Robert, thanks for your reviews of this document. Mike, all, thanks for your responses and the clarifications around TLS. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Jun 22, 2020, at 3:50 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-secevent-http-poll-11 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2020-06-22 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-05-13 > IESG Telechat date: 2020-06-25 > > Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard > > My concerns have been addressed. > > I am a little worried about the Appendix A content of -push - it could be > misconstrued to say sending SETs over unencrypted channels is supported by the > proposed standard. It would ease my worry if you made this change (again to the > -push document): OLD: > If SETs are transmitted over unencrypted channels > New: > If SETs were allowed to be transmitted over unencrypted channels > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
