Hi Pascal, Thank you for reviewing the document. I believe Lorenzo explained why the draft supports NAT64 only. Re: the terminology comment: On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:55 PM Pascal Thubert via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > " > ... IPv6-only mode (either > because the OS and all applications are IPv6-only capable or because > the host has some form of 464XLAT [RFC6877] deployed), > " > Do we have a good reference of what we mean by the v6-only mode of a host > - or an interface for that matter ? > > Else it would help to define it before we use it. Note, the terminology > defines a "IPv6-only capable host" but not the "mode". I'll update the Terminology section with the following definition: IPv6-only mode as 'a mode of operation when a host acts as IPv6-only capable and does not have IPv4 addresses assigned (except for IPv4 link-local address [RFC3927]). Would it address your comment? -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
