Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating

To: Michael Thomas <mike@xxxxxxxx>, Joseph Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 22:54:19 +0000
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5b4ea5ea-e2d6-1a01-3676-dd2a72dbd2c1@mtcc.com>
References: <28A2725D-00F8-4739-8A73-ED176F8EF561@strayalpha.com> <3AA98081-A70E-4076-8096-79FFAEE8A738@huitema.net> <830b91c4-0bb5-af5b-f7b8-c5edd43dc87e@mtcc.com> <4512C1BF-5722-479B-8506-24018610BEAD@strayalpha.com> <5b4ea5ea-e2d6-1a01-3676-dd2a72dbd2c1@mtcc.com>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002

>    That's my point: TLS leaves the transport layer unprotected.

Why do you say that?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating
  - From: Michael Thomas

References:
- Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating
  - From: Joseph Touch
- Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating
  - From: Christian Huitema
- Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating
  - From: Michael Thomas
- Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating
  - From: Joseph Touch
- Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating
  - From: Michael Thomas