Solid 5 from me.
It's not so much the difference in the signal-to-noise ratio; it's that
the signal is a very, very different kind of topic, and the ability to
reliably and automatically separate them so that I can handle them
differently is invaluable.
/a
On 4/30/2020 10:00 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
It's been around six months since we started the <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
list, and we said that we would evaluate the results after six months.
To that end, the IESG would like to see comments about how it's been
working.
Please respond to this thread to comment. It would be helpful if the
first line of your comment gave a succinct view of your opinion on the
following 5-to-1 scale:
5: Perfect! Don't even think about going back!
4: I really like it and want to keep it.
3: Neutral: I don't care either way.
2: I don't like it, but I can live with it if we decide to keep it.
1: It's terrible! Please, please go back to the old way!
And, of course, if you have further comments beyond those numbers,
include those as well. We want to know what you think. Comments,
please, in the next couple of weeks, by 15 May. Thanks!
Barry, for the IESG
