Re: Processing of Expired Internet-Drafts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:43:58AM -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
> 
> It seems to me that there is a better approach to the above, at least in 
> the context of the above. If the "tombstone" is literally as described, it 
> would be far more space/search/etc efficient for us to have the tombstone 
> consist of an added text line in a file indicating that the named draft 
> expired on a certain date, and keep separate files for the active internet 
> drafts. It seems to me that this makes it simpler to maintain a mirror and 
> to find temporary documents.

I would prefer this as well.

						- Ted


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]