Re: SMTP Minimum Retry Period - Proposal To Modify Mx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 12:03 PM 1/9/2004, Keith Moore wrote...
>> There's 
>> just one more condition - his mate, though great as mates go, is an anti-
>> RBL purist.  He refuses to use RBLs.
>
>His mate is a wise man.  RBLs are a really terrible idea, and they've
>caused a lot of valid mail to be rejected. 

Not only that, but at least in the U.S., they are illegal per 18 U.S.C. 1030 -Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Computers. That law reads in part:

"Whoever... knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer...shall be punished..."

MAPS RBL and DUL and those who participate in it knowingly transmit information (zone lookups) and commands (SMTP configurations) which causes unauthorized damage to protected systems. 

"[T]he term "protected computer" means a computer... which is used in interstate or foreign commerce or communications, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication of the United States"

This clearly covers any computer with which the user may send email for Internet commerce, including eBay and web purchases.

"The term 'damage' means any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information"

Use of the MAPS RBL and DUL clearly impairs the availability and integrity of the Internet email system and the information transferred using that system. MAPS RBL and DUL participants are actively participating in illegal denial of service




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]