-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: | Keith, | | the reason the secretariat is doing this in stages is exactly because we | want to see how big the false-positive issue is. | | I currently personally use Mailman 2.60 with Bayesian filtering and | close-to-default rules; it seems to run at a very low rate of false | positives. |
In my experience lots of false positives from spamassassin+bayesian is the result of the user making false assumptions about the linearity of the spamassassin point-scale.
MVH leifj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/4eT08Jx8FtbMZncRAnw6AJ46QS2hwy6KVNFtGwnKLtNZbjvEeACgtckS ad+Jaiv8wJPjix7MV9NS0SE= =e3+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----