Re: Adding [ietf] considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Because we, people on the road, use various mail systems and even web based mail, where the filters are not applied yet...

Why such a war for just 6 characters, while all mailing lists do it?

Have you been out there?

Let's give it a try and see...

Cheers

On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 04:26, Keith Moore wrote:
> 
> would it be asking too much to add [ietf]  to the subject line of each message?

yes.  it's completely redundant information, and it interferes with readability,
particularly on small displays.

why don't you get a better mail reader that lets you classify mail as it arrives?
that is a much better way to distinguish one list's traffic from another.
----
Franck Martin
franck@xxxxxxxxx
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9  D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]