Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx writes: > Linux could at least stand on the claim that it was implementing > the RFCs as written, and that the interoperability problem was > due to the other end failing to implement the RFCs. The RFCs are not specific enough to support such a claim. > Feel free to point at examples of Microsoft saying "We're MS, > and we're going to implement the RFC because if everybody did > it the RFC way, the world would be a better place, even if > there's breakage along the way". Microsoft knows better; apparently Linux developers and/or supporters do not.