Re: censorware on ietf mailing lists?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I tottally support the criterias used by Spamassassin even if they are RFC compliants...

We need some tools to help us clean the SPAM. Yes there are some false positives, but I have less of them than SPAM...

I clean most of my mailbox by looking a the SPAM header, without having to read all that junk...

I think we will argue here on how we can fight SPAM and how can IETF help it... There are tools out there, but this is not a perfect science...

Cheers

On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 08:01, Keith Moore wrote:
I just saw a message that was forwarded to the ipv6@xxxxxxxx list by 
spamassassin.
Apparently spamassassin decided it was spam but forwarded to the list 
anyway with explanation of why it thought it was spam.  Not only was 
the message legitimate (it was an I-D announcement) but it reveals just 
how bogus the criteria used by spamassassin were:

Please consider this a formal objection to this practice.  Even if 
spamassassin is being configured to forward the messages, it's doing so 
in such a way as to make the actual message very difficult to read.
----
Franck Martin
franck@xxxxxxxxx
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9  D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]