% We assign small networks to IXPs. % % The document has the following in it reflecting this: % % CIDR block Smallest RIPE NCC Smallest RIPE NCC % Allocation Assignment % 2001:0600::/23 /35 /48 % % Again, if people feel that the text published needs to be improved then % please let us know. We don't want to publish anything ambiguous or % misleading. We're happy to improve text whenever people indicate % improvements can be made. % % leo vegoda Leo, this is the text we use for IX delegations. For CI uses, transit of said prefix is a valid injection. -------------------------------------------------- Exchange Point Announcement Statement Our statement regarding the injection of EP.NET address space into a routing system. "anyone who has a properly delegated /32 address delegated/assigned from a /24 within 198.32.0.0/16 may announce that /24 to their peers. This is also true in IPv6 space in that anyone with a properly delegated /64 assigned from a /48 in the 2001:0478::/32 space may annouce that /48 to their peers. Prefix aggregates are discouraged and as a general rule may be considered to be proxy aggregations made by parties who are not direct participants in any address assignments from these ranges." --bill Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).