Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



% > I, personally, see absolutely no problem into making it the 'critical infra'
% > or 'root server' prefix, when it is documented correctly. EP.NET acts as
% > a neutral body, with this way kinda of a sub-RIR though. All root-servers
% > should be using the space then btw, not a few, but all of them.
% 
% i, both personally and professionally, think that this would not be desirable.
% -- 
% Paul Vixie

	EP.NET has been doing "micro-allocations" for longer than all but
	one RIR has been in existance. That said, I am greatful that RIRs
	themselves are doing micro-allocations. This for two reasons:

	) customers should have -choice-
	) using multiple prefixes reduces the impact of route flap
	  taking out everyone.


--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]