On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 09:15:07 PST, Michel Py said: > In many enterprise environments, this would be a feature not a bug. > There are some webcams that are definitely inappropriate in a business > setup; given the lack of good enterprise content filtering solutions for > IM, if NAT does break IM webcams I don't have a problem with it. That's backwards. "That kind" of webcam is often *not* behind a NAT at the source end, so can be contacted. What breaks is that *your* user can't have a videoconferencing solution that your business partners can contact. If your user is running "that kind" of webcam from their office, you have bigger management issues than a NAT. :) > For voice there's always > that thing called the telephone that has the advantage to work all the > time with anybody and can be logged. Ever notice that this works a *lot* better when each user has their own phone number, rather than one number that rings at the receptionist's desk and may or may not get transferred to the actual person? There's a lesson there.
Attachment:
pgp00361.pgp
Description: PGP signature