> Joe Touch wrote: > Since we've been lacking a similar non-NAT solution, > we (ISI) built one called TetherNet, as posted earlier: > http://www.isi.edu/tethernet What is this beside a box that setups a tunnel? What's the difference with: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_e xample09186a00801982ae.shtml > FWIW, the "seriousness of the impediments" (Michael Py) > are felt wherever NATs are deployed. Yeah right. That's why there are millions of NAT sites and they all have serious impediments. Michel.