Re[5]: national security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[5]: national security
From: "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:00:36 +0100
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311281027220.27960@zydeco.netbusters.com>
Sender: owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx

Donald Eastlake 3rd writes:

> See RFC 1715, November 1994, and the endless discussions that appeared
> on a variety of mailing list about IPv6 addresses.

I guess the endless discussions didn't help, but that doesn't surprise
me.

References:
- AW: IETF58 - Network Facts
  - From: Hans Peter Dittler
- national security
  - From: jfcm
- Re: national security
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re[2]: national security
  - From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Re[2]: national security
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re[4]: national security
  - From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re[4]: national security
  - From: Donald Eastlake 3rd

Prev by Date: Re[4]: national security
Next by Date: Re[4]: national security
Previous by thread: Re[4]: national security
Next by thread: Re: national security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]