Re: IETF58 - Network Status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IETF58 - Network Status
From: "Perry E.Metzger" <perry@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:06:35 -0500
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>, Michel Py <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311131338010.29960-100000@twin.uoregon.edu> (Joel Jaeggli's message of "Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:41:46 -0800 (PST)")
Sender: owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> the map coloring problem is a lot easier with 8 non-overlaping channels.

And indeed, it isn't even possible with just three.

Perry

References:
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status
  - From: Joel Jaeggli

Prev by Date: Re: IETF58 - Network Status
Next by Date: Re: IETF58 - Network Status
Previous by thread: Re: IETF58 - Network Status
Next by thread: Re: IETF58 - Network Status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]