Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anyone running hostap there;)


On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

> Is a very bad behavior from some people that it seems don't know how to use their own computer.
>
> I will say that this people should pay 5 times the normal fee in the next IETF meeting, because the big number of troubles that they create to the rest of the participants.
>
> We all have a lot of work to do, and can't waste our time because this people.
>
> Sorry, but is what I feel right now, after spending 2 hours trying to get my email.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roland Bless" <bless@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Brett Thorson" <bthorson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; <58crew@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 4:22 PM
> Subject: Re: IETF58 - Network Status - 12:05PM Local Time
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > We have been getting some reports of rooted machines (IETF Attendee machines,
> > > not IETF NOC Machines) that are scanning and causing a lot of traffic on the
> > > network.  IP Addresses are:
> > > 130.129.139.106
> > > 130.129.139.203
> > > Please check your machines for these addresses.  If they are yours, please
> > > stop by the terminal room, and ask for help.
> >
> > It's not only this, but people are still running their cards in ad-hoc mode.
> > While I'm not an expert on this, I just saw several cards in ad-hoc mode
> > in Salon B (mip6 session).
> > There is an ongoing AODV test and I asked the guys at the help desk whether
> > there may be problems with WLAN infrastructure. They said, "oh no, as long
> > as the ssid is different from ietf58, there should be no problem". However,
> > I just saw my card (in managed mode) connecting to a card in ad-hoc mode
> > with a different ssid than ietf58 (I scanned that with my PDA at the same time).
> > My Orinoco card has the latest firmware (8.72) and possibly my linux driver
> > is broken, but obviously there exists this subtle difference between theory
> > and practice (at least for my configuration, sorry). This is really annoying,
> > because it happened several times today.
> > Besides the fact that I've also seen cards in ad-hoc mode advertising "ietf58",
> > I was wondering what others think about interference between ad-hoc mode and
> > infrastructure mode.
> >
> > > We are monitoring the mailing list 58crew@xxxxxxxx for problems.
> > > Comments, suggestions, issues are very welcome here.
> > > We would rather hear of a problem many times on the list, then not at all or
> > > by way of rumor through the meetings.  Please let us know your concerns.
> >
> > Thanks for your support,
> >  Roland
> >
>
> **********************************
> Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
> Presentations and videos on line at:
> http://www.ipv6-es.com
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>
>
>
>

sleekfreak pirate broadcast
world tour 2002-3
live from the pirate hideout
http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]