Re: rfc1918 impact

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Keith will not like it, but NAT vendors will take suggestions that
> will make NAT better.

I'd be happy for them to take suggestions from me, or IETF.  But there's
a big difference between saying "if you must do NAT, please do it this
way" and "NATs are good if they are implemented this way"
 


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]