In message <E320A8529CF07E4C967ECC2F380B0CF902335099@bsebe001.americas.nokia.co m>, Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com writes: > >Hi Scott, > >> But, for what it's worth, I do not think that there was sufficient >> discussion of the option of deprecating SL addresses before >> the consensus check was made. So, in a way, I think the consensus >> was wrongly reached, even if I agree that consensus was reached. > >If the San Francisco meeting was the only time/place that the IPv6 >WG had discussed the topic of what to do regarding IPv6 site-local >addressing, then I might agree with you. What Margaret said. This is hardly the first time the issue has come up; it's been debated for years. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb