> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf@ietf.org [mailto:owner-ietf@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Keith Moore > Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 1:25 AM > To: Scott Bradner > Cc: moore@cs.utk.edu; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: accusations of cluelessness > > > > Just what would you suggest in the way of relaxing? > > since I view this as a hypothetical situation anyway (and one > that isn't > likely to happen in the real world) I don't think it's > necessary to pin down > exactly how they'd go about relaxing the criteria - only to > realize that it is > possible to relax those criteria There are currently several discussions in the ARIN region regarding IPv4 allocations both in regard to minimum size and criteria. Discussions about IPv4 policy and IPv6 policy are of a contiuous nature in all of the RIRs reflecting changes in the operational community. Ray