> > and in as much as we think > > site-locals are bad we must provide a better alternative. this kind of thinking is a dead end. we must not accept all of the proposed uses of site-locals without question, because some of those uses are the very source of the problem. > We need a way for sites to be internally stable even when their > relationship to the world around them changes for whatever reason. see draft-moore-ipv6-prefix-substitution-aa-00.txt for one attempt to solve this particular problem within a site. though I don't think it's sufficient to solve it only "within" a site. Keith