Impact from rfc1918 leaks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michel Py wrote:
|>Leif Johansson wrote:
|>Tell that to the root zone operators and brace for the reaction.
|
|
| Root zone operators, meaning like Verisign?
|
| Michel.
|

Yes. I recently sat in on a presentation from the operators of
I.root-servers.net. Currently 8-10% of queries are from rfc1918
addrs and 3.6% of queries are for rfc1918 .in-addr.arpa records.
That is not an insignifficant number of queries.

Cheers Leif

PS I changed the subject and trimmed the cc. It is sometimes
difficult to keep up when you are in a different timezone. I
appologize for the email you replied to which spilled over to
a thread where it did not belong. DS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/h7PU8Jx8FtbMZncRAuNJAKCt/PyruJz7aLTIjxBSQvueGU3CwgCgokjc
9+0BukBcd0ySLugClYA/QqA=
=5JAc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]