Re: Trouble Interpreting RFC 2142

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sabahattin,

SG> Part of the abstract runs thus:
...
SG> encouraged to support AT LEAST each mailbox name for
...
SG> Then, part of the Rationale says:
SG> "However, if a given service is offerred, then the associated mailbox
SG> name(es) must be supported, resulting in delivery to a recipient 
SG> appropriate for the referenced service or   
SG> role."

SG> Okay, I'm confused at this point.  I must support at least the addresses 
SG> for services running at my domain, in contradiction to the mere 
SG> encouragement we were getting earlier.


Abstracts are not usually taken to be normative.  Certainly, this one is not
normative.

The Rationale and Scope section is intended to be a normative specification
for the generic aspects of the document.  That is, it says how the document
should be applied.

Like any standards document, the degree of actual force it carries is only as
strong as the community decides to impart to it.


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]