Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiatelegitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiatelegitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE)
From: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 21:54:17 +1000
Organization: Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures, Swinburne University of Technology
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org

Shelby Moore wrote:
	[..]
> I join mailing lists for a short time to get something
> done, then I leave asap.

This appears to be the root of our problem.
At least there's an upside.

gja

References:
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE)
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE)
  - From: Shelby Moore

Prev by Date: How to create ID in Windows system?
Next by Date: Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE)
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE)
Next by thread: Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]