Fw: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree. ASCII is a big pain. For example, graphics/pictures can clarify a lot the text and with ASCII is painful and not so clear.
 
We should support format that are easy to edit, formats that support control of changes and so on.

I will agree to support for example a PDF as the final document, instead of TXT.

Regards,
Jordi
 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@muada.com>
> To: "Vernon Schryver" <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
> Cc: <ietf@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:36 PM
> Subject: Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml
> 
> 
> > On woensdag, sep 3, 2003, at 23:34 Europe/Amsterdam, Vernon Schryver 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > It is just plain ***WRONG!*** to even start to consider anything but
> > > ASCII for the official documents.  As hard as it is for the unscared
> > > to believe, even XML will fade away completely and be replaced by
> > > something else even more wonderful, user friendly, easier for convicted
> > > monopolies to embrace and extend, and so forth.  When that happens,
> > > there will be a new calls for "reform."
> > 
> > It's all very simple. The ASCII format in which RFCs are published is a 
> > huge pain, because it puts whitespace, linebreaks, headers, footers and 
> > page breaks in fixed places. So anyone who doesn't use the same printer 
> > as the RFC editor is inconvenienced.
> > 
> > For just reading the RFC this isn't a huge deal as after the first 
> > hundred or so you get used to it. But for editing an existing document, 
> > it is much more painful.
> > 
> > Personally, I'd like to see all the extra stuff that isn't pure ASCII 
> > with a line break after a paragraph go, but I guess this is different 
> > for everyone. But there is one thing I'm pretty sure of: nobody edits 
> > IDs or RFC in their native format. So why not simply make the format 
> > used by the author available in a structured way? This isn't guaranteed 
> > to help (the original format may only be decipherable by no longer 
> > existing tools) but at least there is potential for more efficiency, if 
> > the original format can stilll be read and converted.
> >

**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]