On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Randy Bush wrote: > > unless there is a reason why that host should not be using v6 > > services, hmm? > > because it works now? not unless we are waiting for a zone refresh. ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> @partybus ietf.org AAAA ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 55312 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;ietf.org. IN AAAA ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: ietf.org. 3590 IN SOA ns.ietf.org. action.CNRI.Reston.VA.US. 2003071402 3600 600 2400000 86400 ;; Query time: 2 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.100.1#53(partybus) ;; WHEN: Sun Aug 24 00:46:21 2003 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 89 > > v6 has one salient feature, more address space. well, the hex addresses are nice too, from a security standpoint. > religious selling > does not help the case for v6. make it work simply and directly, > not through 42 hacks. get router, dsl, ... vendors to support it. > then it will be used. mine works because of 1 hack:) > > randy > > > sleekfreak pirate broadcast world tour 2002-3 live from the pirate hideout http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/