Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Harald,


HTA> and should make no assumptions on
HTA> whether the trust is rooted in Verisign or psg.com, or is brokered through
HTA> a mechanism that doesn't need a single root for its trust mechanism.

HTA> If "centralized conference control" doesn't mean that anyone with the
HTA> required resources can be a center, I think we're on a very wrong path.


The style of protocol needed for a single, centralized control
mechanism, versus a distributed and cooperative control mechanism,
typically is quite different.

The obvious example would be centralized dns control -- as we now have
for each node in the tree -- versus efforts to create multiple
authorities for any given node, such as the root.

Did you have in mind a way to reconcile this?


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]