> You got it exactly backwards. There will not be a SIP-specific > conferencing WG. There was however a lot of interest in a > non-SIP-specific conferencing WG. Well it seems like the charter authors (and IESG) have plenty of feedback by now. Now it's up to them to revise that charter to correct the (mis?) impression that the group was intended to promote use of SIP for this situation. Until the charter is revised, is there anything left to discuss? Keith