Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Hogg wrote:

On 17/7/03 8:30, bill wrote:


I would have a hard time taking an IP header bit and making it the "Do
not drop this packet in the presense of a bit error somewhere in the
frame from layer 2 - layer 3". Don't think it is a good idea.


What if that bit got corrupted?


This is a good point. If an L2 error can make a normal "discard on errors" packet come through marked as "tolerate errors", then implementing this feature can introduce errors in existing applications.

--
/==========================================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke@centive.com                   |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com                 |
|Centive           |My opinions are my own.                |
|==========================================================|
|"Where's your sense of adventure?" "Hiding under the bed."|
\==========================================================/




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]