Re: re the plenary discussion on partial checksums

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keith Moore wrote:

so it seems like what we need is a bit in the IP header to indicate that
L2 integrity checks are optional, and to specify for various kinds of
IP-over-FOO how to implement that bit in FOO.


How would an app know to set this bit? The problem is that different L2s will have different likelihoods of corruption; you may decide that it's safe to set the bit on Ethernet, but not on 802.11*. And, in general, the app doesn't know all of the L2s that may be involved when it sends a packet.

--
/==========================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke@centive.com   |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com |
|Centive           |My opinions are my own.|
|==========================================|
|Linux: the Unix defragmentation tool.     |
\==========================================/




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]